Findings of research studies at the Trust

If you’ve taken part in a study at the Trust, hearing about the outcomes of the research can be an important part of the process. We are so grateful to everyone who participates and want to ensure they have the opportunity to find out about the results of their research.

Below is a list of short summaries of research supported by South London and Maudsley. Please be aware that not all studies will be listed, although we will aim to update the page regularly with new summaries. 

If you are a researcher and would like to have your summary included, please contact: slam-ioppn.research@kcl.ac.uk

(2025) Breathe Melodies for Mums with Postnatal Depression

Postnatal depression affects approximately 24% of new mothers, and it can potentially have long-term effects on the mother and child’s wellbeing. Researchers at King’s College London explored whether a specially designed group singing intervention, Breathe Melodies for Mums, by Breathe Arts Health Research, could help improve mental health during this period.  

The study followed 199 mothers across south London experiencing symptoms of postnatal depression and invited them to join 10-week programme133 of those mothers joined group singing sessions, while 66 participants, acting as the control group, were signposted to preexisting mother-baby activity groups that did not involve singing. 

Mothers in both the singing and control groups showed improvements in their mood at week 10 after they had completed either the singing intervention or control activity. However, only those in the singing group continued to show improvements in their mood up to six months after the intervention ended, demonstrating the long-lasting effects of the singing. The singing group also had a much lower dropout rate (23% of participants at 10 weeks) compared with the controls (43% of participants at 10 weeks). 

The group provides a viable intervention for those women who might not otherwise access traditional healthcare and a cost-effective option for the NHS, with the researchers finding that the cost of the singing intervention falls well within the range the UK healthcare regulator - the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) - recommends the NHS pay for interventions.  

Overall, the study highlights group singing as a low‑cost, accessible, and enjoyable option that could complement existing treatments for postnatal depression. It offers a practical way for new mothers to find support, connection, and emotional relief during a time when they may need it most. 

This study is part of the SHAPER programme which is assessing the effectiveness and implementation of arts-in-health interventions. It was funded by Wellcome, and received additional support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). 

Clinical effectiveness, implementation effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a community singing intervention for postnatal depressive symptoms: SHAPER-PND, randomised controlled trial (DOI 10.1192/bjp.2025.10377) (Bind, Pariante et al) was published in the British Journal of Psychiatry 

(2025) My Emotions and Me: characterising emotion regulation in young people

Neurodivergent young people with autism or ADHD are more likely to experience depression during their teenage years than those who are neurotypical. One reason may be that autistic and ADHD young people often find it harder to manage their emotions – this is called emotion dysregulation.  

However, most research on this topic comes from adults (like parents, teachers, or doctors) describing what they see. It don’t always include the young people’s own voices or the situations they face. Furthermore, the influence of the environment on the young people’s emotional experience is underexplored. 

In this study, researchers spoke directly to 57 young people with autism, ADHD, or both. They asked about upsetting experiences at home, school, or elsewhere, how these made them feel, and how they respond to these 

Results: From these interviews, we found common themes about what triggered the young people’s emotions and how they respondedThe young people spoke of experiences of being in conflict or ignored by others, having to put on a ‘mask’ in social situations, struggling with self-doubt, and with environments that under- or over-stimulate themThey also spoke about what helped prevent experiences from becoming upsetting, about different ways to manage emotional responses during upsets, and about recognising strengths from within. Subtle differences were observed in how these were expressed among the participant groups. Our study highlights common everyday challenges encountered by young people with autism and/or ADHD. 

You can read more about this study from these papers: 

  • Pavlopoulou, G., Chandler, S., Lukito, S., Kakoulidou, M., Matejko, M., Jackson, I., Balwani, B., Boyens, T., Poulton, D., Harvey-Nguyen, L., Glen, Z., Wilson, A., Ly, E., Macauley, E., Hurry, J., Baker, S., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., & RE-STAR team (2025). Situating emotion regulation in autism and ADHD through neurodivergent adolescents' perspectives. Scientific reports, 15(1), 37464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21208-x 

  • Pavlopoulou, G., Chandler, S., Lukito, S., Kakoulidou, M., Jackson, I., Ly, E., Matejko, M., Balwani, B., Boyens, T., Poulton, D., Harvey-Nguyen, L., Baker, S., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. Sonuga-Barke, E., Chandler, S., Danese, A., Downs, J., Funnell, E., Griffiths, K., … Wilson, A. (2025). Upsetting experiences in the lives of neurodivergent young people: A qualitative analysis of accounts of adolescents diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and/or autism. JCPP Advances, e70038. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70038   

Conclusions: Listening to young people’s own accounts gives new insights into how they manage emotions. These findings are now being used to help design a school-based program to support the mental health of young people with autism and/or ADHD. 

This study was led by researchers at King’s College London and was funded by UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council. More information about the study is available on our website: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/my-emotions-and-me  

(2023-25) The ADHD Remote Technology (ART) research programme

The ADHD Remote Technology (ART) research programme is led by Professor Jonna  Kuntsi  and Professor Richard Dobson at King's College London. The ART research programme uses apps,  smartphones  and watches to learn more about people with ADHD.  

The improvements in technology over the past few years mean we can use wearable devices (like smartwatches) and smartphones to  help  in research and clinical practice . In the future, this can help with research and clinical practice. ART is linked to the RADAR-base  mobile health  platform  ( https://radar-base.org/ and involves the collection of information on  factors such as  exercise, sleep, ADHD  symptoms  and medication use so that we can look for patterns that help explain and predict behaviour. Some of this information is collected without the person having to do anything (passive monitoring ,  e.g. from the smartwatch). Other information is given by people in the study, through answering questionnaires or completing tasks online or on their phones (active monitoring).  

A strength of the ART system and RADAR-base is that it can be changed to fit the aims of the specific study. For example, different questionnaires can be included, and  different types  of wearable devices can be used. The long-term aim of the overall ART research programme is to improve  outcomes  and support healthy lifestyles for people with ADHD, by helping them to manage their symptoms and help make sure that any treatment they get is the right fit for them.  

So far, a few projects have used the ART programme. This includes ‘ART-transition’ (funded by the M edical  R esearch  C ouncil ), 'ART-CARMA' (funded by the E uropean Commission ), and the ART pilot study (funded by a King’s Together Strategic grant). Over £4 million funding has been received by the ART team at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King’s  College London  for these projects.  

ART pilot study

The ADHD Remote Technology (ART) pilot study  involved the  development  of the ART measures We tested this system with 20 people who had ADHD and 20 people who did not have ADHD. Each person used the system for ten weeks. They also took part in two online interviews and provided feedback on how they found the study after they had finished their ten weeks. The results from the ART-pilot study showed that the system was easy to use and provided helpful information on differences between individuals with and without ADHD ( Denyer et al., 2023 Sankesara  et al., 2025 Sun et al., 2023 Denyer et al., 2025 ).  

ART-CARMA

The ADHD Remote Technology study of cardiometabolic risk factors   ( such as  changes in  heart rate , blood pressure, weight, smoking, alcohol use, diet, sleep )  and medication adherence  (whether a  patient   take s  their  as prescribed by their doctor )   (ART-CARMA) project then started in 2021. The ART-CARMA project  i s also led by Professor Jonna  Kuntsi  with Professor Richard Dobson and  is  funded by a large ( over  €1.5 million) grant from the European Commission. The team at King’s work closely with a second team in Barcelona, led by Professor Toni Ramos-Quiroga.  

ART-CARMA is part of TIMESPAN, a five-year-long project involving researchers, clinicians, patients, businesses, software developers and care providers across Europe and the world.  

ART-CARMA collects real-world data  on a daily basis , which people  provide  as they go about their daily lives. The ART-CARMA study uses this real-world data to address two main aims. The first main aim of ART-CARMA is to  explore  the extent to which ADHD medication treatment and exercise, both together and on their own, may affect cardiometabolic risks in adults with ADHD (such as obesity or high blood pressure). Our second main aim is to explore when and why people with ADHD take their ADHD medication. The published study protocol includes the full details on  objectives  and methods ( Denyer et al., 2022 ).  

Together, the teams in London and Barcelona recruited 305 adults from adult ADHD clinic waiting lists. These 305 adults provided data for one year, starting just before they began taking ADHD medication. The first research papers from the project have now been published ( Zhang et al., 2025;   Barnes et al., 2025 ) and there will be many more interesting and helpful papers coming out soon.  

 

Links for papers:   

(2025) The Harbour Project: Using Photovoice to understand the birthing and delivery experience for women who use drugs in the perinatal period

This study wanted to understand what postpartum care (care after giving birth) is like for women who had drug treatment during pregnancy. The researchers used a visual method called  Photovoice , where people take photos to  express   themselves and  their experiences.  

Three women in London who were receiving drug treatment took part. They joined a Photovoice workshop, had one-on-one interviews where they showed their photos to a researcher, and joined an online group discussion to share their ideas with each other.  

Two of the women used their photos to talk about their time in a  residential assessment centre . They said it often felt lonely, with staff watching them very closely. The third woman used her photos to show her experience of giving birth in hospital. She felt the care was not personal to her needs, and that staff judged her because of her past.  

(2025) 'Flexibility is the name of the game’: Clinicians’ Views of Optimal Dose of Psychological Interventions for Psychosis and Paranoia

This study was important because current NICE treatment findings for psychosis are based only on clinical trials and don’t include the views of the experts who deliver therapy. The researchers wanted to find out what clinicians think is the most helpful amount of therapy for psychosis and paranoia. 

Sixteen clinicians took part. They filled out an online questionnaire and joined a group discussion on Microsoft Teams. 

Results: 

  • In community settings, clinicians suggested 1–5 sessions for short-term goals and 10–12 sessions for longer-term goals. 

  • They said it was important to review progress with a supervisor after 20–26 sessions. 

  • Most agreed that 16–26 sessions worked well, but the number should be adjusted for each person. 

  • In hospitals, the number of sessions depended on how long the patient stayed. 

  • Community sessions usually lasted 50–60 minutes, while hospital sessions could be as short as 5 minutes or as long as 2 hours. 

  • In the community, therapy often started weekly, then moved to every two weeks. In hospitals, sessions were usually 1–3 times a week. 

  • These guidelines also applied to therapy delivered online by video. 

The study showed that the “dose” of therapy depends on where it takes place, the treatment plan, and how flexible the therapist can be. Service limits, like funding, also play a role. 

The researchers hope these findings will help create more useful and acceptable treatments for psychosis and paranoia. The study was led by King’s College London and took place remotely between April and September 2023. 

(2024) Service staff and user experience of 1-week wear of a transdermal alcohol sensor device

Service staff and user experience of 1-week wear of a transdermal alcohol sensor device: Acceptability of these devices within a clinical population 

This study looked at a wrist‑worn Transdermal Alcohol Sensor (TAS). The device measures alcohol through sweat on the skin and can track drinking 24 hours a day. They have the potential to be used as a tool in alcohol treatment, but there is limited work with diagnosed alcohol-dependent individuals using a TAS. Researchers wanted to know how accurate it is and what people in alcohol treatment think about wearing it. 

What the study did:

  • People in alcohol treatment wore the device for one week. 

  • They met the researcher every two days to download data and report their drinking. 

  • At the end, they completed a survey and an interview. 

  • Staff from the services were also interviewed about how they thought TAS could be used. 

Participants: 

  • 16 service users (7 men, 9 women) 

  • 10 staff members (4 men, 6 women) 

What the study found: 

1. Accuracy of the device 

  • The TAS was good at detecting days when people drank alcohol. 

  • It didn’t pick up every drinking event, often because the TAS device was removed or data was missing. 

  • Most people found it comfortable and easy to wear. 

  • A few had mild side effects (red wrist, itching from the strap), but no one wanted to stop using it because of them. 

2. Service user experience 

  • Most users said the TAS was simple to use and didn’t affect daily life. 

  • They liked its appearance and comfort. 

  • Some said it helped them avoid drinking because they knew they were being monitored. 

  • Others felt it could reduce the need for daily breath tests during detox. 

3. Staff experience 

  • Staff were mostly positive about using TAS in treatment. 

  • They thought it could help motivated clients and support treatment goals. 

  • They also worried about practical issues, like clients forgetting to wear it, losing it, or needing help with it. 

  • Cost and staff training were also concerns. 

Conclusion 

The TAS device showed good accuracy and was acceptable for people in alcohol treatment to wear. Most service users found it manageable to wear for a week, and both users and staff saw potential benefits for supporting treatment. Staff also shared practical concerns, such as cost, training, and whether clients would keep the device on, but they were generally open to using it with motivated clients. Overall, the study suggests that TAS could be a helpful tool in alcohol services, and the findings provide useful information for future research and real‑world use. 

 

Papers published from this study:  

 

 

subsequent study was conducted in 2023 - similar design but with an added contingency management arm and wear of the TAS for 2 weeks. https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2025/1/e64664  

(2024) Social camouflaging and safety behaviours in autism and social anxiety 

Study overview: Autistic people often talk about  social camouflaging . This means hiding parts of their autistic identity and trying to “fit in” with non-autistic peers. Doing this regularly can make mental health problems more likely.  

Camouflaging can also look like  safety behaviours  used by people with social anxiety. These are things people do to try to make a good impression in social situations. But over time, these behaviours can  actually keep  social anxiety going.  

By looking at how camouflaging and safety behaviours are connected to autism and social anxiety, we can learn better ways to support autistic people who struggle with social anxiety.  

In this study, 61 autistic teenagers and 54 non-autistic teenagers (aged 14–19) took part. They were matched on their levels of social anxiety and asked to fill out online questionnaires about camouflaging, autism traits, safety behaviours, and social anxiety.  

Results:  We found that both autistic and non-autistic teenagers showed overlap between  masking behaviours  (pretending to be non-autistic) and  safety behaviours  (trying hard to come across well). Both were linked to stronger social anxiety symptoms, but not to autism traits.  

This is the first study to show that the overlap between masking and safety behaviours may play a role in keeping social anxiety going in both autistic and non-autistic teenagers.  

Conclusions:  Professionals working with autistic teenagers who have social anxiety should look at how masking and safety behaviours are connected to their anxiety. They can help autistic teenagers by encouraging acceptance of neurodiversity and focusing on their strengths and differences.  

Listen to a podcast interview  with the lead researcher, Dr. Jiedi Lei,  Clinical Psychologist, and Autism Researcher, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London.  

How else do I find out about the results of a research study I’ve taken part in?

There are several stages to the research process, and  different ways  you may hear about the results . Please be aware that it may take several months or even a year or more, until the results are ready.  

  • During the study: Your Participant Information sheet will include important  details  about the study, such as the contact details for your team and a website, if they have one. You can use these to find out more about the progress of the study.    
  • Analysing and publishing the results:  Once the research team has analysed  the results, they will  write up  a summary of their findings. This might be published on the study website if they have one, shared directly with you, and/or published in a journal. It will also be shared on this webpage below, where possible.  
  • Public research registers:  Researchers need to make the findings of their study  publicly available 12 months after completion. They will usually do so with the  organisation where the study was registered. The main public research bodies which list study results are:   
  • South London and Maudsley website:  If the findings are significant and of interest to a broader public, they will be added to our  Newsroom, or the website of a partner  organisation  in the study – our main partner is the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King’s College London.   
  • Social media, events, newsletters, press:  Researchers may use other ways to share their results  – for example via their website, social media, newsletters  or events.  If the results are very important , they may even be featured in the press or media.  
  • Research Club at South London and Maudsley - The Research Club is a collaboration between the SLaM Recovery College and Lived Experience Research Ambassadors. It is a free monthly webinar where researchers discuss their findings and is open to all.
  • Get in touch with your study team:  You can also get back in touch with your study team to check in  about the results if  you’ve  not heard anything. Or you can contact the Trust’s Research Delivery Team who support  research in the Trust:   researchdeliveryteam@slam.nhs.uk    

How do I learn about mental health research taking place across the UK and elsewhere?

Visit the NIHR website for published research on the latest advances in health and care. They also have an Evidence webpage where they share jargon-free study summaries.

Academic Journals like the BMJ Mental Health publishes peer-reviewed studies covering all aspects of mental health.

The Mental Elf posts blogs every week with short and snappy summaries that highlight evidence-based publications relevant to mental health practice in the UK and further afield.

Mental Health Foundation (UK) focuses on preventing mental health problems, policy and reports.

Global Banner